UCSF and I-SPY 2 Breast Cancer Researchers Develop Newly Redefined Breast Cancer Response Subtypes

Research scientists and statisticians from UC San Francisco have developed improved biomarker classifications as part of their research results in the I-SPY 2 trial for high-risk breast cancer patients. The new cancer response subtypes reflect responsiveness to drug treatments and are intended to help clinicians be more precise in how they target therapies.

Improved Classifications May Increase Precision in Targeted Therapies

SAN FRANCISCO, June 6, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Research scientists and statisticians from UC San Francisco have developed improved biomarker classifications as part of their research results in the I-SPY 2 trial for high-risk breast cancer patients. The new cancer response subtypes reflect responsiveness to drug treatments and are intended to help clinicians be more precise in how they target therapies.

I-SPY 2, sponsored by Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative (QLHC) who manages all of the collaborations among academic and industry partners, announced that these new subtypes will move forward in the next iteration of the trial I-SPY 2.2.  

Using the I-SPY 2 (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging And moLecular Analysis) trial’s comprehensive multi-omic molecular characterization of all tumors and the diverse array of drugs targeting different molecular pathways, the I-SPY 2 researchers were able to access the associated datasets to create breast cancer subtypes to match modern treatments.

The researchers found that by combining predictive biomarkers to create response predicting breast cancer subtypes, these subtypes can then be matched to the most effective modern treatments. The best subtyping schemas incorporate Immune, DNA repair, Luminal, and HER2 phenotypes, Treatment assignment using these response predictive subtypes may improve the efficacy of the treatment and patient outcomes.

The researchers recently published their findings online in Cancer Cell: “Redefining Breast Cancer Subtypes To Guide Treatment Prioritization And Maximize Response: Predictive Biomarkers Across 10 Cancer Therapies,” which outlines the newly defined breast cancer response subtypes and improved classifications. 

Using the I-SPY2-990 mRNA/phospho-protein Data Resource from nearly 1000 patients who participated in 10 arms of the I-SPY 2 TRIAL, researchers evaluated 27 predictive I-SPY 2 qualifying biomarkers which led to the development of a response-predictive subtyping schema for prioritizing therapies. First authors Denise Wolf, PhD, and Christina Yau, PhD, both of UCSF, used gene expression, protein levels and response data from 10 drug-arms of the I-SPY2 neoadjuvant trial to create new breast cancer subtypes that incorporate tumor biology beyond clinical hormone-receptor (HR) and HER2 status.

“Use of these response predictive subtypes can be used to guide treatment prioritization, will increase response, and will revolutionize the way in which physicians treat their patients” said Laura van ‘t Veer, PhD, Co-Director of the UCSF Breast Oncology Program and lead scientist for the I-SPY 2 biomarker studies.

The triple negative, as well as the HER2 negative hormone receptor positive high-risk groups, are divided into 3 different response predictive subtypes; the HER2 positive groups is divided into 2 response predictive subtypes. The researchers demonstrate that use of the subtype schema representing several drug targetable pathways allows more appropriate classification of tumors and is an improvement over current standard methods.

The I-SPY 2 trial is considered the archetype of a new approach to clinical trials. Rather than the traditional ‘one drug, one disease’ model for drug development, it is a ‘platform’ trial. I-SPY 2 evaluates multiple drugs (or combination of drugs) in parallel with the goal of determining which drugs work best in various types of breast cancer. I-SPY 2 is also designed for efficiency and speed, by employing an ‘adaptive’ statistical model. The results of each patient are used to refine how the investigational drugs are assigned to new patients. Because of its approach, I-SPY 2 can achieve similar results in a fraction of the time with fewer patients than traditional trials. The goal is to get the right drug to the right patient. These new response predictive subtypes help to better characterize a person’s tumor and from that determine if they are likely to respond to specific treatments such as immune checkpoint blockade.

“The past ten years of treating patients within the I-SPY program has taught us that the standard biomarker tests that we use today do not allow us to optimize treatment for our patients, said Laura Esserman, MD, Co-Director of the UCSF Breast Oncology Programand Director of the UCSF Breast Care Center as well as I-SPY 2 principal investigator. “The whole I-SPY team is truly excited to see these results and improve the way we target our therapies. It is an important advance for patients, and a clear demonstration that the I-SPY model can not only accelerate the development of new cancer treatments, it can also target treatment to the patients who will benefit most. That means increasing the chance a drug will lead to a cure and minimizing the use of other therapies that may not be useful or add toxicity.”

The I-SPY 2 network will prospectively test the response-predictive subtyping schema in I-SPY2.2, an upcoming version of the I-SPY2 trial that incorporates a sequential multiple assignment randomize trial (SMART) scheme and adapts treatment within individual patients based on biology and response.

The I-SPY2-990 mRNA/RPPA Data Resource is now publicly available. “This dataset will be an invaluable resource to the breast cancer research and drug development community, and ultimately to patients,” said Esserman.

ASCO Presentations Using Response Subtypes from I-SPY2 Trial Data

In addition to the findings presented in this study, three abstracts to be presented at ASCO 2022 this week include use of I-SPY data and show improvement of response prediction by the new subtype schema within the traditional breast cancer receptor subtypes. These studies include:

Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates for HR+/HER2- breast cancer by molecular subtype in the I-SPY2 Trial

Molecular subtype to predict pathologic complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer in the I-SPY2 trial

Improved Pathologic Complete Response Rates for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the I-SPY2 Trial

About I-SPY and the I-SPY 2 TRIAL

The I-SPY (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging And moLecular Analysis) TRIAL is conducted by a consortium that brings together the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), leading academic medical centers, and patient advocates, as well as Merck and other pharmaceutical and biotech companies.

The I-SPY 2 TRIAL is a collaborative effort among academic investigators from 20 major cancer research centers across the U.S. and Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, the FDA, and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Cancer Biomarkers Consortium. Major supporters include The Safeway Foundation, and the Bill Bowes Foundation.

The I-SPY 2 TRIAL’s adaptive statistical design was developed by the pioneering principal investigators for the I-SPY trial, Laura J. Esserman, M.D., MBA, and Donald A. Berry, Ph.D., professor of biostatistics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and founder of Berry Consultants in collaboration with the FDA, industry, and many leading academic collaborators including the Agents working group chair (Doug Yee, M.D., University of Minnesota), the Trial Operations working group chair (Angie DeMichele, M.D., University of Pennsylvania), and the Biomarker working group chair (Laura van ‘t Veer, Ph.D., UC San Francisco). The trial is a unique collaborative effort where over 100 clinicians are actively engaged in the conduct of the trial.

The I-SPY 2 TRIAL adaptive-trial design is based on Bayesian predictive probability that a biological regimen will be shown to be statistically superior to standard therapy in an equally randomized 300-patient confirmatory trial. Regimens that have a high Bayesian predictive probability of showing superiority in at least one of the predefined signatures graduate from the trial. Regimens are dropped for futility if they show a low predictive probability of showing superiority over standard therapy in all signatures. A maximum total of 100 patients can be assigned to each experimental regimen. A regimen can graduate early and at any time after having 60 patients assigned to it.

I SPY 2.2 incorporates more patient centered design and the ability to test new targeted agents without traditional chemotherapy as first line, followed by the most targeted agents by the new response predictive subtypes in the new and improved design. The goal is, over the next 5 years, to get 90% of high-risk patients to experience a complete response (disappearance of tumor) with targeted and less toxic combinations before surgery.  This will accelerate the ability to personalize care for women with breast cancer. Learn more at https://www.ispytrials.org

About Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative

The I-SPY 2 TRIAL is sponsored by Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative™, a 501c (3) charitable organization. Quantum Leap is dedicated to integrating high-impact clinical research with patient care to improve and save lives. By bridging the gap between research and clinical care, Quantum Leap works in collaboration with patients, medical researchers at the University of California, other academic centers nationwide, healthcare innovators, and stakeholders–to accelerate learning in medicine, improve the delivery of healthcare, create better outcomes, and increase the quality of life. Our goal is to improve and save lives. Learn more at https://www.quantumleaphealth.org

About UCSF: The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) is exclusively focused on the health sciences and is dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. UCSF Health, which serves as UCSF’s primary academic medical center, includes top-ranked specialty hospitals and other clinical programs, and has affiliations throughout the Bay Area. UCSF School of Medicine also has a regional campus in Fresno. Learn more at ucsf.edu or see our Fact Sheet.

To learn more about the I-SPY 2 Trial, please go to: https://www.ispytrials.org

SOURCE Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative

For more information, email karyn.digiorgio@quantumleaphealth.org

Contact Us
QLHC in the News
Working at QLHC
Contact Us

Tracey Heather

Advocate Liaison

As Patient Engagement Lead at Quantum Leap, I manage follow-up data projects for the I-SPY 2 Trial, develop strategies to strengthen patient engagement, and oversee the I-SPY Advocate group. After six successful years raising funds to support Quantum’s mission, I embraced this new role last summer, drawn by the opportunity to make a direct impact on the patients we serve. Each day brings new challenges and insights, and I especially enjoy supporting and collaborating with our inspiring I-SPY Advocates.

Outside of work, I am pursuing a Master of Public Administration with a focus on nonprofit management at SF State. I’m passionate about trail running, skiing, live music, camping, traveling, and collegiate gymnastics—my daughter competes at Oregon State. For the past 5 years, I have volunteered with SF CASA as a mentor to an incredible 18-year-old foster youth whose resilience continually reminds me of life’s true priorities.

Carolyn Clark Beedle

Carolyn Clark Beedle, a 2023 breast cancer survivor, joined the advocate program after successful completion of treatment with the UCSF Breast Oncology Program. Her experience working with a patient advocate during her TNBC treatment led to an understanding that empowering women to advocate for their own health and healthcare will contribute to improved health outcomes and broader access to care. Carolyn began advocating for cancer patients and their families during her treatment, now is a member of the Breast Science Advocacy Core (BSAC) with the UCSF Breast Oncology Program, and currently shares information and research with CFNP associates at La Clinica in the Bay Area to inform and empower their patient population.

Carolyn is continuing her on the ground training as an advocate reviewer with both Quantum Health and BSAC and is enrolled in the Patient Advocacy Training in Health Science course with Stanford Medicine. Her 30+ career in corporate marketing/communications, program development and non-profit leadership augmented by her breast cancer treatment experience serves Carolyn well in representing and communicating the patient voice and perspective.

She received her BA (History/English Lit) and MA (Public History/Research and Record Management) from the University of San Diego, is a proud fifth generation San Franciscan, and active board member with numerous non-profits that support social work and the arts.

Silver Alkhafaji

Silver Alkhafaji is a PhD candidate in the Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacogenomics (PSPG) program at UCSF. She received her Bachelor of Science in Chemical Biology from UC Berkeley. Prior to UCSF, she worked in the Clinical Pharmacology Department at Genentech. Silver’s current research focuses on non-invasive liquid biopsies to predict response and side effects of immunotherapies and endocrine therapies in early-stage breast cancer participants in I-SPY 2.

Silver is interested in clinical outcomes research to advance precision medicine and improve cancer patients’ quality of life. She is passionate about health equity, inclusive research, patient advocacy, and women’s health.
Silver volunteers at the Patient and Family Cancer Support Center at UCSF where she assists in patient navigation and connecting patients and their families with resources that improve their healthcare experience while receiving cancer treatments and/or during survivorship. 

Through her DEI work in her PhD program, Silver raises awareness around issues related to social justice and community building through organizing community-centered events. Additionally, she is a member of the Life Sciences Career Advisory Council at Thrive Scholars, where she enjoys supporting college students of color from economically disadvantaged communities in providing the opportunities they need to thrive at top colleges and in high-trajectory careers. 

Silver is a member of the American Association of University Women (AAUW) Alameda Branch where she focuses her efforts on increasing membership of community college women coming from exceptional backgrounds: student parents, low-income, and first-generation college students.

In her free time, she writes poetry and prose on emotional healing, radical acceptance, and patience. Writing has helped her process difficult situations and connect with people on a deeper level.

Jane Mortimer

Jane is a breast cancer survivor and advocate dedicated to positively impacting the lives of women affected by the disease. Diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer in 2012, she participated in the I-SPY 2 trial at UCSF and has been cancer free for more than ten years.

Her advocacy journey began in 2003 at UCSF as a volunteer with the Patient and Family Cancer Support Center and Decision Support Services and she previously managed the Peer Support program at UCSF. Drawing on her experience in marketing and media strategy, she uses her skills to make a meaningful impact by supporting advocacy and research that improves outcomes for women living with breast cancer.

Jan Tomlinson

In March of 2023 , Jan was diagnosed with a large aggressive triple negative breast cancer and informed that her cancer was the” bad girl” of cancer and offered standard chemotherapy for 24 weeks. Devasted by the diagnosis Jan felt like she had a dire prognosis. After seeking several opinions, she opted to join a Clinical Trial program for her treatment. The trial consisted of significantly less chemotherapy, and monitored closely over a 12-week period, The data predicted a complete pathological response , and she then went immediately to surgery. Pathology reports supported that she had a successful outcome reaching PCR meaning the tumor was gone, and no residual cancer was found in the surrounding tissue or lymph nodes. Jan was thrilled when her surgeon advised her of the results. The experience made Jan want to give back and share information that she received when she was at a critical juncture in her diagnosis. She is so passionate about making sure that everyone knows that the standard of care is one treatment option.

As she says, “ clinical trials have to be on the table” Because she achieved PCR, she expects a great outcome. She wants to share her story and encourage other women to strongly consider and participate in clinical trials. Jan is a UCSF Patient Advocate, involved in several programs they lead. Jan also is a BLACC Cab Member. Jan recently was in Washington DC to participate on a panel on Clinical Trials for ISPY at the National Press Club. UCSF will be hosting the RISE Up For Breast Cancer event where Jan will share her experience with clinical trials.

Deborah Collyar

Deb is a connector who founded Patient Advocates in Research (PAIR) “where research meets reality,” bringing ideas and people together for medical advances that offer real results for diverse patients and families.

Her vast experience between the worlds of tech, communication, strategy, management, policy, and equity bridges gaps between patients, scientists, medical providers, payers, governments, and non-profits.

Deb infuses patient engagement into projects, gathers relevant patient input, and encompasses many diseases, programs and policies at grassroots, national and international levels through companies, academia, and governments.

Key patient insights are delivered throughout discovery, development, clinical trials, results reporting, data-sharing, standards, genomics, and into practice.

Her experience spans translational and clinical research, epidemiology, health outcomes, and health delivery research with academia, federal agencies, companies, and patient communities.